MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047545178 · doi:10.1109/bcc.2007.4430549

Fuzzy Vault for Face Based Cryptographic Key Generation

2007· article· en· W2047545178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsComputer scienceKey generationKey (lock)CryptographyQuantization (signal processing)Fuzzy logicArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Scheme (mathematics)Data miningTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method for changeable cryptographic key generation using face biometrics signal. A previously introduced scheme, fuzzy vault, is utilized for secure binding of randomly generated key with extracted biometrics features. The major technical difficulty is to map noisy biometrics representation to the exactly correct key. In this paper, the proposed method is based on 2-dimensional quantization of distance vectors between biometrics features and pairs of random vectors. A windowing process is applied to tolerate the variations of biometrics signals. Further, we also introduce a two-factor scheme, where the quantized distance vectors are generated with user-dependent random vectors. By integrating a second factor, both the biometrics and the key are changeable, and zero error rate can be obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207