Figures de la conception et de l’innovation dans l’artisanat1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les figures de la conception et de l’innovation exposées dans cet article sont le fruit d’une réflexion menée à partir d’un travail empirique réalisé auprès d’artisans. Ces derniers, qui proviennent d’univers de métiers parfois traditionnels, considèrent qu’ils innovent, même si c’est à des degrés divers et dans des formes variées. Après avoir présenté les approches de l’innovation et leurs limites dans le contexte de l’entreprise artisanale, nous décrivons la méthodologie de recherche qui s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une démarche originale de travail impliquant des universitaires et un club régional de dirigeants artisanaux. La proposition d’une typologie de couples conception-innovation est ensuite discutée et envisagée pour caractériser l’artisan par une figure originale de manager de projet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".