La judiciarisation des rébellions par les forces de l’ordre à Bruxelles de 1945 à 1975
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous étudions la judiciarisation du phénomène rébellionnaire, en tant qu’ensemble d’événements isolés de violence contre des forces de l’ordre, à Bruxelles de 1945 à 1975. Nous avançons la thèse selon laquelle la judiciarisation du phénomène est dominée par l’action policière. Afin de l’appuyer, nous allons montrer que tant dans l’interaction des agents avec les citoyens que dans leur interaction avec les magistrats du parquet, les forces de l’ordre dominent la construction pénale des faits. Par ailleurs, nous soutenons que la mainmise policière dans la judiciarisation des rébellions relève de la dépendance professionnelle des magistrats du parquet des agents de l’ordre, hypothèse déjà soutenue par Grosman (1971). Nous illustrons, enfin, ce propos par un exemple issu de nos sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".