Behind the Man: John Laurie, Ruth Gorman and the Indian Vote in Canada (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Behind the Man: John Laurie, Ruth Gorman and the Indian Vote in Canada Laurie Meijer Drees (bio) Ruth Gorman . Behind the Man: John Laurie, Ruth Gorman and the Indian Vote in Canada. Frits Pannekoek, editor University of Calgary Press 2007. lvi, 278. $39.95 In Alberta, John Lee Laurie is recalled in the name of a mountain, picturesquely situated in the Bow Valley, and in the name of a boulevard in Calgary. In the fall of 2009, he was memorialized at the Annual Fall [End Page 560] Service of the McDougall Stoney Mission Church, on the reserve that is the home of Bearspaw, Chiniki, and Wesley First Nations of the Nakoda people to mark the fiftieth anniversary of his passing. Who was this man? Who was the woman 'behind' him? Through the shared efforts of Ruth Gorman - and after her death, Frits Pannekoek - the story of this man and his work among First Nations peoples in Canada is recalled in Behind the Man. With this book, Gorman sought recognition for Laurie. As a young married woman with a law degree who practised briefly in her father's Calgary law office of Peacock and Skene before her marriage ended her practice, Gorman collaborated closely with Laurie as a legal advisor for the Indian Association of Alberta during the critical years when Status Indian people in Canada were struggling to have their voices heard in Canada's political system. Gorman and Laurie, together, were instrumental in the amendment of the 1960 Indian Act, which allowed First Nations the federal vote. Although Gorman intended to complete the tribute to Laurie herself, she was unable to finish her undertaking. Pannekoek, with a team of dedicated assistants, assumed the Herculean task of assembling her many notes and anecdotes into the manuscript now available to readers interested in Canadian political history, First Nations history, and women's history. Behind the Man is an auto/biography. It evokes the early years of Laurie's life and then merges into an autobiography of Gorman in the final six chapters, as her life intersected with Laurie's. Pannekoek contextualizes Gorman and her writing in a lengthy academic introduction featuring many relevant references. Yet despite this added context, the work is essentially a highly personalized political history of the First Nations' franchise. Overall, Behind the Man reads easily, evoking the free-spirited nature of Gorman and her dear friend John Laurie in a Western Canada, where freedom was mainly the domain of cowboys and oilmen, not women or Indigenous peoples. As a true freedom fighter, Gorman recalls how she and Laurie broke loose the political shackles that bound Indian people. It is with this flair and style that the book reveals its true nature: it prefers the pluck and gallantry of Gorman and Laurie to delving into the complex political history of Aboriginal political action. Indeed, Gorman was a feminist; she was an active agent of change in an era and place in Canada where conservatism ruled most households. At the same time, money and privilege were on her side as she worked. Her writings reveal beautifully the liberal attitudes colouring her reasons for, to use her words, 'helping my Indians.' Pannekoek has done well in assembling Gorman's manuscript posthumously, giving voice to a perspective and story little recalled in our national political history lessons. But, in keeping with the penchant of so many writers of Canadian history, the author and the editor prefer to [End Page 561] create and elevate stories of heroes and heroines above those of the collective communities those heroes or heroines may - or may not - have represented. If Behind the Man is a reader's introduction to the Indian Act and First Nations' franchise, it should probably be balanced with works by those who served as objects of Gorman's and Laurie's philanthropic efforts: Indigenous people themselves, including authors such as Harold Cardinal, William Wuttunee, Waubageshig, Dick Fiddler, Pat Dieter, and many others. Laurie Meijer Drees Laurie Meijer Drees, Department of Native Studies, University of Saskatchewan Copyright © 2010 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".