Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’espace de Fontenelle est d’abord un espace cosmique. Trois principes l’organisent : l’empirisme, hérité de la scolastique, l’éternité et la divisibilité de la matière, l’assimilation de l’univers à une machine, dont le mouvement a été donné et est surveillé par Dieu. Fontenelle, dans les Pastorales et dans ses opéras, est un poète du ciel et du mouvement des planètes. Cette splendeur se ramène aux grands principes que nous avons mis en évidence et surtout au mécanisme et aux tourbillons cartésiens. Ainsi l’univers est comparable à une montre. Il y a la beauté d’une scène d’opéra et l’éclat d’une « feuille d’or ». Mais le philosophe enlève la feuille et discerne dans les merveilles théâtrales le jeu des poids et des contrepoids. Ce serait triste : la littérature pare le mécanisme, comme Dieu le cache sous les beautés de la nature. Il en est de même en morale : notre vie serait fort triste sans les plaisirs qui l’animent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".