Diagnostic yield of upper endoscopy in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Subanalysis of the HUPIR registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND, AIMS: According to Porto Criteria upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is recommended in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nevertheless, previous studies revealed frequent involvement of UGI tract even in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic role of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and assess the prevalence and different aspects of UGI involvement in children registered in the Hungarian Pediatric IBD Registry (HUPIR) from 1st of January 2007 to 31th of December 2009. METHODS: Twenty seven institutes provided prospective follow-up data about newly diagnosed IBD patients to HUPIR. The registry was based on detailed questionnaire (76 parameters) involving anamnestic data, laboratory findings, activity indexes, diagnostic procedures, endoscopic examinations (EGD and ileocolonoscopy), and histological data. Localization and phenotype of disease were based on the Montreal classification criteria. RESULTS: During the 3-year period 420 children were diagnosed with IBD, 265 (63%) of them had Crohn's disease (CD), 130 (31%) UC, and 25 (6%) IBD-unclassified (IBD-U). The mean age at diagnosis was 13.2 years (range: 1.2-18 years). EGD was performed in 237 patients (56%), in most cases in patients suffering from CD. Macroscopic lesions on EGD were noted in 64% of patients with CD and 40% of children with UC. Characteristic lesions for CD (ulcer, erosion, aphthous lesion, and granuloma) were noted in 31% of CD patients, however, EGD helped to establish the final diagnosis in 9% of CD patients (diagnostic yield, 9%). CONCLUSIONS: There was a high frequency of UGI involvement in children with CD and UC. One third of CD patients showed significant lesions at upper endoscopy and one patient out of ten had real diagnostic help from EGD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".