MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047797124 · doi:10.1117/12.467455

Microrelief diffraction structure recording in LC reactive mesogen

2002· article· en· W2047797124 on OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Soloviev, Yuri B. Boiko, P. Perlo, Chander P. Grover

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesogenMaterials sciencePhotomaskPhotosensitivitySubstrate (aquarium)Liquid crystalLayer (electronics)PhotoinitiatorOptoelectronicsOpticsLaserNanotechnologyComposite materialResistPolymerLiquid crystalline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactive liquid crystal (LC) mesogen (trade mark C6M of Merck) is shown to possess efficient relief formation properties. Photosensitive formulation was made by mixing of the reactive LC mesogen C6M with 2% of photoinitiator (Irgacure 651). Photosensitive layer (thickness 70 micrometers ) was obtained by melting the formulation in the gap between two glass substrates. One of the substrates contained a photosensitive silver-halide layer, in which the amplitude mask was recorded with the resolution Fequals40 lines/mm. The amplitude function of the mask represented a phase function of the desired CO2 laser focusing element, designed for wavelength 10.6 micrometers and 45 degrees incidence . Exposure of the reactive mesogen layer through the mask was carried out at elevated temperature of Tequals85 degrees C by UV source (wavelength 365 nm). Immediately after exposure a substrate with photomask was removed and the relief structure in the exposed layer was measured to be ca. hequals1 micrometers deep. After that a dark self-development was allowed resulting in the increase of relief depth h up to 15 micrometers within several hours. The desired hequals7.5 micrometers needed for the most efficient performance of CO2 laser focusing element at 10.6 micrometers and 45 degrees incidence, was stabilized by interrupting self-development with uniform UV exposure of the recorded structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207