Radiofrequency Ablation of Solitary Eosinophilic Granuloma of Bone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Granuloma of BoneWe have read with considerable interest the article by Corby et al. [1], "Radiofrequency Ablation of Solitary Eosinophilic Granuloma of Bone."The authors correctly point out that radiofrequency ablation potentially may be a useful option in the treatment of this benign but often highly symptomatic disease without entailing the morbidity of more-invasive procedures.This has certainly proven to be the case in the radiofrequency treatment of osteoid osteoma, which as the authors well know is typically an appendicular affliction and has been treated with considerable success over the past 20 years.The two patients reported by Corby et al. [1] had lesions that were considerably larger than the typical osteoid osteoma and would require an umbrella probe of the type Corby et al. used for effective ablation.In the case of their first patient, who had a femoral diaphyseal lesion, virtually the entire crosssectional diameter of the bone was taken up by abnormal tissue.In our experience and that of others, if MRI is performed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".