MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047821388 · doi:10.1002/mren.200900071

Optimal Bayesian Design of Experiments Applied to Nitroxide‐Mediated Radical Polymerization

2010· article· en· W2047821388 on OpenAlex
Afsaneh Nabifar, Neil T. McManus, Eduardo Vivaldo‐Lima, Park M. Reilly, Alexander Penlidis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian probabilityVariety (cybernetics)Computer scienceDesign of experimentsNitroxide mediated radical polymerizationQuality (philosophy)Process (computing)PolymerizationMaterials scienceMathematicsRadical polymerizationArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bayesian design of experiments is a powerful method which offers several distinct benefits over standard experimental designs. The basics of the method are briefly described, followed by four case studies giving a step‐by‐step illustration of its application to both bimolecular and unimolecular NMRP. Firstly, the Bayesian design is an improvement with respect to information content retrieved from process data. It allows one to change the levels of factors with relative ease and is flexible and “cost”‐effective with respect to the number of experiments. More importantly, the method has the ability to incorporate into the design prior knowledge coming from a variety of sources. Diagnostic criteria can shed more light on the quality of prior knowledge and the significance of estimated effects. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it