Posterior Transdiscal Three-Column Shortening in the Surgical Treatment of Vertebral Discitis/Osteomyelitis With Collapse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive case series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early surgical results and complications of thoracic transdiscal osteotomies and vertebral shortening for the treatment of thoracic discitis/osteomyelitis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic discitis/osteomyelitis leads to collapse of the disc space and/or vertebral body. We propose a novel technique to achieve the same goals as anterior column reconstruction through an entirely posterior approach. Shortening of the vertebral column provides structural support without the morbidity of an anterior approach. METHODS: Following REB approval, retrospective review of the charts of five patients that underwent posterior only thoracic transdiscal osteotomies and vertebral shortening for discitis/osteomyelitis was carried out. Posterior only surgery was performed in these patients with excision of the affected disc space and corresponding posterior elements. Instrumented fusion was performed across the segment spanning multiple vertebral levels. Clinical outcome, radiographic correction, and perioperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Three patients had bacterial discitis, and 2 had tuberculosis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 61 years (50-76). Mean follow-up was 45 months (25-63). There was no neurologic deterioration; 2 patients with Frankel grade B improved to grade D and E, respectively. Mean kyphosis corrected from 36 degrees (14-90) to 4 degrees (0-8), and the mean construct spanned 9 levels (6-15). No major complications were encountered during surgery. Two patients underwent revision surgeries, 1 patient died of unrelated causes at 6 months. All patients were treated with a full course of postoperative antibiotic treatment. No cases of recurrent infection were recorded. CONCLUSION: Thoracic transdiscal osteotomy with vertebral shortening is a safe and effective option for the treatment of infectious discitis/osteomyelitis with associated kyphosis. With adjuvant antibiotics, it effectively eradicates the infection through a posterior only approach, avoiding the need for anterior procedures and long anterior struts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".