MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047836863 · doi:10.3917/riges.372.0054

Comprendre le cycle émotionnel des expatriés de longue durée pour mieux le gérer

2012· article· fr· W2047836863 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Allain Joly

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La vie des expatriés de longue durée traverse une série d’étapes assez prévisibles. Ils vivent d’abord une période d’exaltation, à laquelle succède une phase dépressive. Ayant réussi à composer avec la réalité du pays d’accueil lorsqu’ils se rapprochent de la fin de leur mandat, ils rentrent chez eux pour découvrir un choc inattendu, celui du retour. Dans cet article, nous vous proposons de découvrir ces différentes phases de la vie des expatriés de longue durée. Ensuite, afin d’optimiser les retombées et de minimiser les inconvénients de l’expatriation sur les plans individuel et organisationnel, nous formulons des recommandations destinées aux employés expatriés ainsi qu’aux entreprises qui recourent à leurs services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesFrench-language works237,207