Middle ear instillation of gentamicin and streptomycin in chinchillas: electrophysiological appraisal of selective ototoxicity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate selective vestibular ototoxicity of gentamicin and streptomycin in the chinchilla model. In total, 10 chinchillas underwent left middle ear instillation of one of three agents: gentamicin, streptomycin and saline. Electrophysiological data (otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), auditory brainstem evoked response (ABRs), and ice-water electronystagmography were recorded before and after instillation. Animals were sacrificed for temporal bone studies using scanning electron microscopy. Morphological changes in the cochlear and vestibular neuroepithelia were correlated with electrophysiological changes. Widespread ipsilateral cochlear and vestibular neuroepithelial injuries were observed and correlated with loss of OAEs, ABRs and ice-water caloric response. This study provides no evidence of selective vestibular ototoxicity of gentamicin or streptomycin. Morphological damage correlates with, but precedes loss of electrophysiological parameters. Chinchillas, like other small mammals, may not be an ideal model for the study of human ototoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it