MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047841734 · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000877

Remote Ischemic Conditioning Prevents Lung and Liver Injury After Hemorrhagic Shock/Resuscitation

2014· article· en· W2047841734 on OpenAlexafffund
Chung Ho Leung, Christopher A. Caldarone, Feng Wang, Seetha Venkateswaran, Menachem Ailenberg, Brian Vadasz, Xiao‐Yan Wen, Ori D. Rotstein

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineIschemiaResuscitationLiver injuryTumor necrosis factor alphaIschemic preconditioningMyeloperoxidaseLungShock (circulatory)AnesthesiaImmunologyPathologyInternal medicineInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) on organ protection after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation (S/R) in a murine model. Background: Ischemia/reperfusion resulting from S/R contributes to multiple organ dysfunction in trauma patients. We hypothesized that RIC before shock (remote ischemic preconditioning), during shock (remote ischemic “PER”conditioning), or during resuscitation (remote ischemic “POST”conditioning) could confer organ protection. We also tested the effect of ischemic conditioned plasma on neutrophil migration in vivo using transgenic zebrafish models. Methods: C57Bl/6 mice were subjected to S/R with or without hindlimb RIC. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and liver tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 1β mRNA were evaluated. In some experiments, lung protein leakage, cytokines, and myeloperoxidase activity were investigated. Plasma from mice subjected to RIC was microinjected into zebrafish, and neutrophil migration was assessed after tailfin transection or copper sulfate treatment. Results: In mice subjected to S/R, remote ischemic preconditioning, remote ischemic “PER”conditioning, and remote ischemic “POST”conditioning each significantly reduced serum alanine aminotransferase and liver mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 1β and improved liver histology compared with control S/R mice. Lung injury and inflammation were also significantly reduced in mice treated with remote ischemic preconditioning. Zebrafish injected with plasma or dialyzed plasma (fraction >14 kDa) from ischemic conditioned mice had reduced neutrophil migration toward sites of injury compared with zebrafish injected with control plasma. Conclusions: RIC protects against S/R-induced organ injury, in part, through a humoral factor(s), which alters neutrophil function. The beneficial effects of RIC, performed during the S/R phase of care, suggest a role for its application early in the posttrauma period. Ischemia/reperfusion injury resulting from resuscitated hemorrhagic shock contributes to multiple organ dysfunction in patients after trauma. In a murine model, remote ischemic conditioning prevented liver and lung injury after shock/resuscitation. Using zebrafish models of neutrophil infiltration, remote ischemic conditioning liberated humoral factor(s) that prevented neutrophil migration toward sites of injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of SurgerySame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207