MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recent Research on Alcohol Tolerance and Dependence

2001· review· en· W2047851537 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroshi Suwaki, H. Kalant, Susumu Higuchi, John C. Crabbe, Seitaro Ohkuma, Masashi Katsura, Masami Yoshimura, Robert C. Stewart, Ting‐Kai Li, Friedbert Weiss

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
KeywordsNeurochemicalAddictionAlcohol dependenceAlcoholAlcohol toleranceReinforcementEthanolPsychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryNeuroscienceMedicineBiologyBiochemistrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article represents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2000 ISBRA Meeting in Yokohama, Japan. The chairs were Hiroshi Suwaki and Harold Kalant. The presentations were (1) Influence of ADH genotypes on acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome in Japanese, by Susumu Higuchi; (2) Use of genetic analyses to refine phenotypes related to alcohol tolerance and dependence, by John C. Crabbe; (3) Neurochemical basis for alcohol dependence, by Seitaro Ohkuma and Masashi Katsura; (4) Adenylyl cyclase and development of tolerance to addictive drugs, by Masami Yoshimura; (5) Tolerance in rat lines selectively bred for alcohol preference, by Robert C. Stewart and Ting-Kai Li; and (6) Ethanol reinforcement, dependence, and vulnerability to relapse: Interactions between neuroadaptive and conditioning factors, by Friedbert Weiss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.619
GPT teacher head0.626
Teacher spread0.007 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcoholism Clinical and Experimental ResearchSame topicAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyFrench-language works237,207