Three-dimensional pulsation of rat carotid artery bifurcation observed using a high-resolution ultrasound imaging system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The arterial structure experiences cyclic pulsation in three-dimension (3-D) by pulsatile blood flow. Here we reconstruct the 3-D carotid artery bifurcation (CAB) geometry from three rats to observe the pulsatile variation of the carotid artery geometry by a high-resolution ultrasound imaging system (Vevo 770, VisualSonics, Canada). Two experienced observers manually segmented the cross-sectional ultrasound images to outline the arterial lumen. From the constructed geometry of three subjects, we observed that the CAB geometry favorably expanded to anterior/ posterior direction which parallel to sagittal plane. Furthermore, an in vitro blood flow experiment using an anthropomorphic flow phantom was implemented to more clearly understand the asymmetric pulsation phenomenon. Finally we confirmed the elastic bifurcation geometry favorably expands in a direction of bifurcation, both in vivo and in vitro measurements, which derived by bifurcated flow. This finding, the asymmetrical pulsation phenomenon of carotid bifurcation in 3-D, may be useful in understanding hemodynamic etiology of cardiovascular diseases and also provide more realistic input data for computer simulation of hemodynamics. [This work was supported by MSIP Korea, under the C-ITRC support program (NIPA-2014-H0401-14-1002) supervised by the NIPA and also supported by the Richard Merkin Visiting Fellowship Program of the Focused Ultrasound Foundation.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".