MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047887079 · doi:10.1115/icnmm2008-62250

Transient Analysis of a Liquid Flow in Microchannel of Varying Cross-Section

2008· article· en· W2047887079 on OpenAlexaff
Guyh Dituba Ngoma, Amsini Sadiki, Fouad Erchiqui

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2008 6th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrochannelLaminar flowMechanicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsHeat fluxTransient (computer programming)Flow (mathematics)Heat transferPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study the transient analysis of a laminar liquid flow in a three-dimensional microchannel of varying rectangular cross-section was numerically investigated. The imposed heat fluxes on the microchannel upper and bottom wall, the Joule heating due to an applied electric potential at the microchannel inlet and outlet, the electroosmosis, the pressure-driven flow, and the liquid temperature-dependent thermophysical properties were accounted for. The time-dependent liquid flow velocity profile and the time-dependent liquid temperature distribution were obtained respectively solving the Navier-Stokes equations and the energy equations for a laminar incompressible liquid flow using a computational fluid dynamics code. The effects of the microchannel divergence angle and the microchannel dimensions on the liquid flow and the heat transfer in the microchannel were analyzed. Results obtained show significant influences of the pressure difference between the microchannel inlet and outlet, the imposed heat flux, and the microchannel inlet width on the transient and steady states of the liquid flow velocity and the liquid temperature distribution. A comparison of the results of the developed model with those achieved considering the liquid constant thermophysical properties and those obtained from a microchannel of a constant cross-section was made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2008 6th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and MinichannelsSame topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207