MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evidence for an excess of B → <i>D</i><sup>(*)</sup><i>τν</i> decays

2013· article· en· W2047902477 on OpenAlexaff
R. Kowalewski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHiggs bosonMuonParticle physicsBranching fractionStandard Model (mathematical formulation)BosonNuclear physicsCharged particlePhysics beyond the Standard ModelIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The full data sample from the BaBar experiment is used to measure the ratios of branching fractions and , where ℓ refers to an electron or muon. These ratios are sensitive to the presence of new physics in charged current decays and are sensitive probes for charged Higgs bosons. These ratios are predicted in the standard model with small theoretical uncertainties, and many experimental uncertainties cancel in the ratio. The measured values, R(D) = 0.440 ± 0.058 ± 0.042 and R(D *) = 0.332 ± 0.024 ± 0.018, exceed standard model expectations by 2.0 σ and 2.7 σ , respectively. Accounting for correlations, the combined departure from the standard model is 3.4 σ. The measured values are not compatible with a charged Higgs boson in type-II two-Higgs-doublet models, but can be accommodated in more general models involving charged mediators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207