Women in leisure services: managing the social-cultural nexus of gender equity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poststructural analyses have recently transformed gender theory and methodology within many social science disciplines and subject fields including management studies. Leisure management, however, has retained a focus on structural analyses of power. As a result, cultural representations of gender-power relations have remained largely untheorized within the leisure management literature. This paper draws on poststructural feminist theory to supplement and complement previous structural analyses of gendered power in leisure management. The paper cites empirical evidence from research into Gender Equity in Leisure Management, commissioned by the Institute of Leisure and Amenity Management and undertaken by the author. Analysis of the results concurs with similar research undertaken in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States, demonstrating that gender-power relations are frequently produced, legitimated and reproduced at the intersection of social and cultural forces in organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it