MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047939633 · doi:10.1258/ult.2010.010030

Diagnosis and laparoscopic surgery in the female form of persistent Müllerian duct syndrome

2010· article· en· W2047939633 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Letourneau, Patrick Lawrence, G McTavish, Iain Kirkpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrologic and reproductive health conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaginaMullerian DuctsUterusCervixMüllerian mimicryHysterectomyGynecologyMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryRadiologyInternal medicinePathologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome (PMDS) is a rare anomaly characterized by the presence of a combination of Müllerian derivatives, including a uterus, fallopian tubes, cervix or vagina in otherwise normally differentiated men. The female form of PMDS is particularly uncommon, making up only 5–10% of the 150 reported cases. In this case, PMDS was not diagnosed until the patient was well into the fifth decade of life. He presented with haematuria and haematospermia and was referred for sonographic examination. During the transrectal prostate ultrasound examination the Müllerian remnants were discovered, including uterus, cervix and vagina. In this report we describe the sonographic and magnetic resonance appearances of PMDS and discuss management via laproscopic hysterectomy and bilateral ovotestectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasoundSame topicUrologic and reproductive health conditionsFrench-language works237,207