MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047977810 · doi:10.1002/andp.201000165

Cornell and Coulomb interactions for the D‐dimensional Klein‐Gordon equation

2011· article· en· W2047977810 on OpenAlexaff
H. Hassanabadi, H. Rahimov, S. Zarrinkamar

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnalen der Physik · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCoulombEigenfunctionDegeneracy (biology)Degenerate energy levelsKlein–Gordon equationDimension (graph theory)Quantum mechanicsCoulomb barrierCoulomb wave functionMathematical physicsElectric potentialElectric potential energyEnergy (signal processing)Woods–Saxon potentialScatteringEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMathematicsNonlinear systemPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigate the D‐dimensional Klein‐Gordon equation in the presence of both Coulomb and Cornell potentials by quasi‐exact methodology. The Coulomb potential yields a degenerate result as the dimension increases, i.e. the quantum number l plays no role in the energy relation. For the Cornell potential, however, the behavior is different and no degeneracy exists. Closed form of eigenfunctions is reported and the energy behavior for different states is numerically discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnalen der PhysikSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207