MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047981174 · doi:10.1080/13647830500307758

Numerical investigation of the instability for one-dimensional Chapman–Jouguet detonations with chain-branching kinetics

2005· article· en· W2047981174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Theory and Modelling · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArrhenius equationThermodynamicsInstabilityDetonationBranching (polymer chemistry)ChemistryKinetic energyReaction rateKineticsChemical kineticsActivation energyPhysicsStatistical physicsMechanicsPhysical chemistryExplosive materialClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of one-dimensional Chapman–Jouguet detonations driven by chain-branching kinetics is studied using numerical simulations. The chemical kinetic model is based on a two-step reaction mechanism, consisting of a thermally neutral induction step followed by a main reaction layer, both governed by Arrhenius kinetics. Results are in agreement with previous studies that detonations become unstable when the induction zone dominates over the main reaction layer. To study the nonlinear dynamics, a bifurcation diagram is constructed from the computational results. Similar to previous results obtained with a single-step Arrhenius rate law, it is shown that the route to higher instability follows the Feigenbaum route of a period-doubling cascade. The corresponding Feigenbaum number, defined as the ratio of intervals between successive bifurcations, appears to be close to the universal value of 4.669. The present parametric analysis determines quantitatively the relevant non-dimensional parameter χ, defined as the activation energy for the induction process ϵ I multiplied by the ratio of the induction length Δ I to the reaction length Δ R . The reaction length Δ R is estimated by the inverse of the maximum thermicity (1/ max) multiplied by the Chapman–Jouguet particle velocity u CJ . An attempt is made to provide a physical explanation of this stability parameter from the coherence concept. A series of computations is carried out to obtain the neutral stability curve for one-dimensional detonation waves over a wide range of chemical parameters for the model. These results are compared with those obtained from numerical simulations using detailed chemistry for some common gaseous combustible mixtures. Keywords: : DetonationsNumerical simulationsInstabilityLimitChain-branching kineticsNonlinear dynamics Acknowledgement H.D. Ng was supported by the NSERC and FQRNT scholarships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it