MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Defiant desire in Namibia: Female sexual–gender transgression and the making of political being

2008· article· en· W2047982566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Ethnologist · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesLesbianSociologyPoliticsHuman sexualityQueerResistance (ecology)Sexual identityHuman rightsIdentity (music)HeteronormativityIdeologyPolitical scienceLawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In this article, I explore local productions of desire in Namibia by focusing on the engagement of young, working‐class lesbians with human rights ideologies of sexual freedom. I discuss how various techniques deployed by a sexual minority‐rights NGO allow youth to amplify and legitimize their embodied sense of sexual–gender difference. In my analysis of their self‐mediated incitement, I regard desire as a moral practice; practices of self‐determination and acts of resistance are generated and authenticated through repeated reflection on the internality of desire. My elaborations also emphasize class‐related issues. I argue that struggles with class and gender inequality destabilize the very notion of “sexual identity” in ways that open up political and erotic possibilities between lesbians and other working‐class women in Namibia, blurring the dividing lines of identity politics and of gender and class politics. [ lesbian resistance, African sexuality, moral practice, desire, global queer identity, human rights ]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it