MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047985039 · doi:10.7202/1013874ar

Albert Tessier, agent de transmission d’une idée du Québec en France entre 1930 et 1950

2013· article· fr· W2047985039 on OpenAlex
Brigitte Nadeau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAcadémie française
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les années 1920, Albert Tessier agit comme médiateur culturel entre le régionalisme mistralien et le Québec, dans le but d’adapter l’identité canadienne-française rurale et catholique au monde moderne. Entre 1930 et 1950, il participe à la transmission, en France, d’une idée du Québec comme pays de haute moralité et de nature. Il sélectionne ses intermédiaires à partir de critères régionalistes. Il répond à la demande française, mais s’interpose comme un filtre entre le Québec et les passeurs Georges Cerbelaud Salagnac, Raoul Blanchard, Maurice Genevoix et Marie Le Franc. Tessier fait du Québec un relais en retournant à la France un régionalisme mistralien remanié. Il sert sa propre cause de consolidation de l’identité canadienne-fraçaise en proposant le Québec comme société-mémoire de la France.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it