MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047986257 · doi:10.1109/isit.2013.6620610

Real-time streaming of Gauss-Markov sources over sliding window burst-erasure channels

2013· article· en· W2047986257 on OpenAlexaff
Farrokh Etezadi, Ashish Khisti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErasureEncoderSliding window protocolUpper and lower boundsBinary erasure channelComputer scienceAlgorithmGaussianMarkov processErasure codeMarkov chainDecoding methodsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Channel capacityWindow (computing)TelecommunicationsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study sequential streaming of Gauss-Markov sources over a burst-erasure channel. In any sliding window of length L, the channel introduces a single erasure burst of maximum length B. The encoder observes a sequence of vector Gaussian sources, where the vectors are i.i.d. across the spatial dimension and correlated across the temporal dimension. The encoder output can depend on all source vectors observed up to that time but not on any future source vectors. The decoder is required to reconstruct the source vectors instantaneously and within a quadratic distortion constraint of D, except those source vectors that either appear during the erasure periods or a recovery period of W following each erasure burst. We focus on time-invariant encoders and establish upper and lower bounds on the minimum compression rate R(L, B, W, D). Our lower bound is obtained by making connection to a Gaussian multi-terminal source coding problem. The upper bound is based on distributed source coding, but requires a careful analysis of the achievable rate. Numerical comparisons indicate that the proposed technique provides significant gains over other baseline schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207