MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047986257 · doi:10.1109/isit.2013.6620610

Real-time streaming of Gauss-Markov sources over sliding window burst-erasure channels

2013· article· en· W2047986257 on OpenAlexaff
Farrokh Etezadi, Ashish Khisti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErasureEncoderSliding window protocolUpper and lower boundsBinary erasure channelComputer scienceAlgorithmGaussianMarkov processErasure codeMarkov chainDecoding methodsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Channel capacityWindow (computing)TelecommunicationsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study sequential streaming of Gauss-Markov sources over a burst-erasure channel. In any sliding window of length L, the channel introduces a single erasure burst of maximum length B. The encoder observes a sequence of vector Gaussian sources, where the vectors are i.i.d. across the spatial dimension and correlated across the temporal dimension. The encoder output can depend on all source vectors observed up to that time but not on any future source vectors. The decoder is required to reconstruct the source vectors instantaneously and within a quadratic distortion constraint of D, except those source vectors that either appear during the erasure periods or a recovery period of W following each erasure burst. We focus on time-invariant encoders and establish upper and lower bounds on the minimum compression rate R(L, B, W, D). Our lower bound is obtained by making connection to a Gaussian multi-terminal source coding problem. The upper bound is based on distributed source coding, but requires a careful analysis of the achievable rate. Numerical comparisons indicate that the proposed technique provides significant gains over other baseline schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207