MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047993103 · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.021403

Observation of above-threshold dissociation of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:none/><mml:none/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>in intense laser fields

2008· article· lv· W2047993103 on OpenAlexaff
Qun Zhang, John W. Hepburn, Moshe Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2008
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissociation (chemistry)PhysicsIonizationAtomic physicsCoulomb explosionPhotodissociationCoulombIonChemistryPhysical chemistryQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the observation of above-threshold dissociation of a multielectron molecular system, $\mathrm{Na}_{2}{}^{+}$. The process is due to continuum-continuum transitions in a field-dressed molecular continuum. Three well-resolved fragmentation channels with different kinetic energy release patterns have been detected, of which two are associated with ordinary photodissociation via ``light-induced potentials'' into $\mathrm{Na}(3s)+{\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$ and $\mathrm{Na}(3p)+{\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$, and one with continuum-continuum transitions and above-threshold dissociation into $\mathrm{Na}(3p)+{\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$. We show that when we dress this molecule with a field whose intensity is $\ensuremath{\sim}3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{12}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}∕{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, above-threshold dissociation prevails over other processes, such as field ionization followed by Coulomb explosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207