Is fruit size important in the selection of oviposition sites by cranberry fruitworm, <i>Acrobasis vaccinii</i>?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Under laboratory conditions, females of Acrobasis vaccinii (Riley) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) oviposit significantly more often on larger than on smaller cranberry fruit. This behaviour ensures that neonate larvae have access to maximum resources and are larger when moving to the next fruit. However, while there is some evidence that on a large spatial scale females may lay eggs in patches of larger fruit, there was no evidence of such an oviposition preference within patches in natural bogs. These results may be explained by the fact that the oviposition period for A. vaccinii begins early in the cranberry season, before fructification is completed, leading to potential competition among females for the first fruit present in the environment. Laying eggs on the first fruit available may be advantageous as this behaviour increases the probability that females select unexploited fruit. This strategy would be particularly effective for maximizing female fitness in grazer frugivorous species (such as the cranberry fruitworm) that live in environments where severe climatic conditions induce limited flowering/fruit formation and where hosts thus are rare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".