MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Renal responses to hemorrhage are age dependent in conscious sheep

2004· article· en· W2048028531 on OpenAlexaff
Francine G. Smith, Alp Şener, Raghmeet Basati, Isam Abu‐Amarah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Medicine and Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were carried out in conscious, chronically instrumented lambs (n = 8) and young adult sheep (n = 11) to investigate age-dependent renal responses to hemorrhage. Various parameters of renal function were measured for 1 h before and 1 h after either 10% hemorrhage (experiment 1) or 20% hemorrhage (experiment 2). The two experiments were carried out in random order at intervals of 2-5 days. There were no effects of 10-20% hemorrhage on renal plasma flow in either age group. Blood pressure decreased after 20% but not 10% hemorrhage in both age groups. Glomerular filtration rate and filtration fraction decreased after 20% hemorrhage in both age groups, the decrease being greater in lambs than young adult sheep. In response to 20% hemorrhage, urinary flow rate and urinary Na+ excretion rate decreased by 40 min after hemorrhage in young adult sheep but not lambs and remained decreased for 60 min; urinary chloride excretion rate showed a similar response. In lambs but not young adult sheep, free water clearance increased by 20 min after 20% hemorrhage and remained above control at 60 min. Urinary osmolality decreased at 20 min after 20% hemorrhage in young adult sheep but not lambs, returning to control levels by 40 min. These data provide new information that renal responses to hypotensive hemorrhage appear to be developmentally regulated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207