MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048055283 · doi:10.4141/p01-047

<i>Bacillus cereus</i> UW85 inoculation effects on growth, nodulation, and N accumulation in grain legumes: Controlled-environment studies

2002· article· en· W2048055283 on OpenAlexaffvenue
J. Kevin Vessey, Terry J. Buss

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizobiaInoculationNitrogenaseBiologyBacillus cereusShootNitrogen fixationSymbiosisHorticultureAgronomyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treating seed with Bacillus cereus strain UW85 stimulates nodulation in soybean, but the underlying mechanisms of this stimulation are poorly understood. In this study we assessed the effects of inoculation on nodulation, nitrogenase activity and dry matter partitioning in soybean (cv. Maple Ridge), common bean (cv. OAC Rico) and pea (cv. Express) under controlled, gnotobiotic conditions. Plants were grown for 34 d under controlled-environment conditions without a mineral N source, at low two levels of (brady)rhizobia inoculation. Soybean and common bean were grown at a single temperature regime and pea was grown at two temperature regimes. Each trial consisted of five treatments (noninoculated control, low (brady)rhizobia inoculation, low (brady)rhizobia plus UW85 inoculation, high (brady)rhizobia inoculation, and high (brady)rhizobia plus UW85 inoculation) with six plants as replicates per treatment in a completely randomized design. Inoculation of soybean with UW85 increased growth of roots, shoots, and nodules across both levels of bradyrhizobia inoculation and increased plant N accumulation by 12%. In oculation with UW85 also increased whole-plant nodulation (nodules plant -1 ) by 16%, but there were no effects on specific nodulation [nodules g -1 root dry weight (DW)], individual nodule DW, nitrogenase activity (μmol H 2 g -1 nodule DW h -1 ) or N 2 fixation efficiency (g plant-N g -1 nodule DW). Inoculation of pea with UW85 at the low temperature regime increased whole-plant nodulation by 19%, but had no positive effects on any other growth parameters. Inoculation of common bean with UW85 had no positive effects on any aspects of growth, nodulation or nitrogenase activity. Our data indicate that under gnotobiotic conditions, UW85 inoculation increases nodulation in soybean indirectly by increasing root growth and not stimulating the nodulation process per se. The bacterium had little to no positive effects on pea and common bean symbioses. Key words: Bacillus cereus UW85, Glycine max, growth-promotion, nodulation, Phaseolus vulgaris, Pisum sativum

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207