MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048060750 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22225

An extended evolutionary design method for the optimization of hydrogen networks with pressure constraint

2015· article· en· W2048060750 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuexue Jia, Li Li, Guilian Liu, Minbo Yang, Yong-Biao Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematical optimizationMatrix (chemical analysis)Capital costComputer scienceWork (physics)Total costEvolutionary algorithmMathematicsChemistryEngineeringMechanical engineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the evolutionary method is extended to the work utility consumption and the capital cost of compressors incorporated with fresh hydrogen consumption in the optimization of hydrogen networks. The total cost matrix (TC matrix) is constructed with the cost of each possible match calculated. Further, the minimum total cost rule is proposed to compare different sources that can match the same sink. Based on this, the potential match matrix (P matrix) and the optimal match matrix (O matrix) can be determined sequentially. The fresh hydrogen, work utility consumption, total cost, and corresponding hydrogen distribution network can be obtained from the O matrix. The hydrogen network of a real refinery is studied to demonstrate the application of the extended evolutionary method. The results show that total cost determined by the extended method is 3.32 % less than that identified by the original evolutionary method, and the same as that calculated by the mathematical programming method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207