MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048066533 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2013.6723540

Detecting beetle infestations in pine forests using MODIS NDVI time-series data

2013· article· en· W2048066533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asim Anees, J.C. Olivier, Malgorzata O'Rielly, Jagannath Aryal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingPixelNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexSeries (stratigraphy)EstimatorEnvironmental scienceGeographyComputer scienceEcologyClimate changeArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper considers the detection of beetle infestations in North American pine forests using high temporal resolution, coarse spatial resolution MODIS remotely sensed satellite images. Two methods are proposed to detect beetle infestation, both applying a triply modulated cosine model. The first method uses an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) for estimating model parameters, and the second a Least Squares estimator. When beetles infest a forest, the changes in the affect large geographical area. Therefore, the change detection metrics are based on the time series of each pixel, and do not utilize information from neighboring pixels. Using data from the Rocky Mountain region of the United States and of British Columbia in Canada, we show that our methods are highly effective at detecting beetle infestations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207