MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048076104 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0224

Let Her Speak for Herself: Nineteenth-Century Women Writing on Women in Genesis (review)

2008· article· en· W2048076104 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Cynthia Scheinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)PoetryLiteratureNarrativeExegesisSpiritualityHistoryRubricCharacter (mathematics)SociologyClassicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Let Her Speak for Herself: Nineteenth-Century Women Writing on Women in Genesis Cynthia Scheinberg Marion Ann Taylor and Heather E. Weir. Let Her Speak for Herself: Nineteenth-Century Women Writing on Women in Genesis. Baylor University Press. xvii, 502. US $44.95 As a scholar whose research and teaching centre on the intersections between nineteenth-century literature and religion, and as someone who teaches courses in nineteenth-century literature, women writers, and 'The Bible as Literature,' it is extremely gratifying to have this new collection, Let Her Speak for Herself: Nineteenth-Century Women Writing on Women in Genesis by Marion Ann Taylor and Heather E. Weir. The volume is a very important addition to all those fields; well researched and annotated, it makes it possible to demonstrate truly the unique and important position women in the nineteenth century had in the exegesis and analysis of biblical texts. The editors clearly demonstrate how writing on scripture offered a sanctioned way for women to voice ideas about a variety of topics, including women's rights and slavery as well as theology, spirituality, and religious institutions, all from the seemingly safe perspective of biblical commentary. The focus on Genesis is well chosen, as for many students and scholars, this book of the Bible offers the richest opportunities for gendered and narrative analyses, given its plethora of strong female characters. The editors have chosen both prose and poetic selections, as well as a variety of genres within the larger rubric of prose. Perhaps most importantly, the editors have worked hard to represent a variety of religious perspectives. The organization of the volume will prove especially friendly to general readers and undergraduates, though the scope of the book and the rigorous primary source material will also prove valuable for graduate students and scholars. The opening 'Introduction' is an excellent orientation to the worlds of nineteenth-century religious issues, women's issues, and literary contexts. The head notes on each entry are also useful, even as they implicitly suggest how exciting further research could be for many of these writers. The volume is organized by the individual female [End Page 258] characters in Genesis, which allows for the editors to point to common points of interest or disparate interpretations in the introductions and conclusions they offer for each section. The bibliography is a gift for those interested in pursuing the work of these women, and the two indexes, organized by both subject and scriptural passage, will assist scholars working in a variety of fields. The volume thus will satisfy many different kinds of readers, and on first reading suggests provocative ideas for further consideration. Over and over, the selections remind us that biblical exegesis is a creative act; this is, of course, important to emphasize, because for too long in feminist literary history, many women who wrote on the Bible were seen only as unoriginal mouthpieces for patriarchal or conventional perspectives. The volume also reminds readers how, for many women, the writings included in the volume were central to their family's economic survival; repeatedly, we read how the writings on the Bible were a legitimate and sanctioned way for women to enter the literary market. Indeed, many of these women were very successful in their publishing, a fact often forgotten when we generalize about unknown or 'lost' women writers. Further, as so many of the selections were clearly geared toward women readers, the volume highlights what an important market women readers created for writing on scripture. Thus, echoing other recent work on women's literary history, this book testifies to the very active reading, writing, and publishing life of women in the nineteenth century and reminds us that it was really only in later periods, rather than their own, that many of these women became 'lost.' Cynthia Scheinberg CUNY Cynthia Scheinberg, Department of English, Mills College Copyright © 2008 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207