Coordinated development of identified serotonergic neurons and their target ciliary cells in <i>Helisoma trivolvis</i> embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Embryonic neuron C1s (ENC1s) are bilateral serotonergic neurons that function as cilioexcitatory motor neurons in embryonic development of the pond snail, Helisoma trivolvis. Recent experiments demonstrated that these neurons stimulate cilia-driven embryo rotation in response to hypoxia. In the present study, a comprehensive anatomic analysis of these cells and their target ciliary structures was done to address the following questions: (1) Does ENC1 have a morphology consistent with an oxygen-sensitive sensory cell; (2) Is the development of ENC1's neurite outgrowth pathway coordinated with the development of its target effectors, the pedal and dorsolateral ciliary bands; and (3) What is the anatomic basis of ENC1-ciliary communication? By using an array of microscopic techniques on live and serotonin-immunostained embryos, we found that each ENC1 possessed an apical dendrite that was capped with an integral dendritic knob penetrating the embryo surface. The dendritic knobs contained both microvilli and nonmotile cilia that suggested a sensory transduction role. Each ENC1 also possessed a descending projection, whose development was characterized by the rapid formation of the primary neurite pathway between stages E13 and E15, with the primary neurite of the right ENC1 developing in advance of its contralateral homologue. Secondary neurite branches formed between stages E15 and E30 in a spatiotemporal pattern that closely matched the development of the dorsolateral and pedal bands of cilia. Both dorsolateral and pedal ciliated cells formed basal processes that contacted ENC1 neurites. Finally, gap junction profiles were observed at neurite-neurite, neurite-ciliary cell, and ciliary cell-ciliary cell apposition sites, whereas putative chemical synaptic profiles were observed at neurite-neurite and neurite-ciliary cell apposition sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".