MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048098228 · doi:10.1159/000126356

Intracellular Recordings from Neurons of the Arcuate Nucleus in Superfused Explants of Rat Hypothalamus

2008· article· en· W2048098228 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Macmillan, Charles W. Bourque

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypothalamusArcuate nucleusInternal medicineEndocrinologyIntracellularNucleusBiologyChemistryNeuroscienceCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The membrane properties of arcuate nucleus (ARN) neurons and their connections with extranuclear regions were examined in vitro, using intracellular recordings obtained in superfused explants of rat hypothalamus. Current-clamp analysis revealed that the electroresponsive properties of a large proportion of ARN neurons are influenced by the expression of various forms of low threshold rectification. When the initial membrane potential of a neuron was maintained negative to -70 mV, depolarizing current injection could precipitate an immediate bursting response, due to the activation of a low-threshold spike, or delay firing as a result of transient outward rectification. These properties represent a means by which changes in membrane potential may modulate the responsiveness of ARN neurons to synaptic input. Indeed, electrical stimulation revealed that in addition to efferent projections to the supraoptic nucleus, medial preoptic area, or neurointermediate pituitary, subgroups of ARN neurons may receive a reciprocal, or collateral innervation from each of these areas. This functional diversity of intrinsic and synaptic mechanisms provides ARN neurons with a high capacity for the complex local processing of afferent information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207