MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048123736 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2012.6399335

A Trust Distribution Service for MANETs

2012· article· en· W2048123736 on OpenAlexaff
Humphrey Rutagemwa, David Kidston

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrust management (information system)GossipComputer scienceComputer networkReputationComputational trustNode (physics)Mobile ad hoc networkGossip protocolComputer securityWireless ad hoc networkService (business)Trust anchorRouting (electronic design automation)Distributed computingWirelessTelecommunicationsBusinessNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are very useful for communications in areas with very little or no infrastructure. However, that very lack of an authoritative management infrastructure makes it imperative that nodes cooperate by passing traffic fairly and securely. The use of a reputation or trust management system can identify failed, misbehaving or malicious nodes. One aspect of trust management that has been relatively overlooked is the trust distribution service. In this paper, we usea trust model that uses local observations from all nodes in the network to calculate per-node reputation using a trust matrix. We have developed a gossip-based distribution service that reduces network-wide reputation convergence time by prioritising critical trust updates. Simulations show that this distribution service substantially outperforms naïve gossip and provides insight into optimal node density for epidemic-based routing schemes in resource constrained networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207