MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048130331 · doi:10.12968/hosp.2000.61.8.1392

The use of sildenafil in heart disease

2000· editorial· en· W2048130331 on OpenAlex
Graham Jackson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHospital Medicine · 2000
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSildenafilAsymptomaticErectile dysfunctionOccultIncidence (geometry)Diabetes mellitusDiseasePopulationVascular diseaseInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePediatricsAlternative medicinePathologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common, affecting 30% of men between the ages of 40–70 years to some degree (National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on Impotence, 1993). It increases in incidence with age as does coronary heart disease (CHD), and with an ageing population treating ED co-existing with CHD has become an increasing management challenge. As vascular diseases and diabetes are the major causes of ED, an asymptomatic male presenting with ED should be screened for evidence of occult vascular pathology (Jackson et al, 1999a), with one study identifying a 50% incidence of silent CHD (Pritzer, 1999).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it