MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048157380 · doi:10.1080/01924780802039220

Fostering Resilience Within an Adult Day Support Program

2008· article· en· W2048157380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActivities Adaptation & Aging · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological resilienceVulnerability (computing)Social supportPerspective (graphical)Resilience (materials science)PsychologyFace (sociological concept)Grounded theorySocial psychologySociologyQualitative researchComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Late life is frequently associated with a sense of vulnerability because of changing functional abilities, dwindling social-support networks, and an increasing reliance on community agencies for support. Despite the risks, many individuals overcome challenges and continue to live happy, productive lives. Resilience is the ability to persevere and thrive in the face of exposure to adverse situations. This grounded-theory study explores the concept of resilience from the perspective of 15 adult day support program participants. The physical activity program, a strong social support network, and access to community support agencies were identified as the protective factors contributing to resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it