NXY‐059 Does Not Affect Bleeding Time in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, 3‐Period Crossover Phase I Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NXY-059 is a novel free radical-trapping neuroprotectant that reduces infarct size and preserves brain function in animal models of acute ischemic stroke. It is the first neuroprotectant to demonstrate a reduction in global disability in a phase III clinical trial, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale. Any effect of NXY-059 on hemostasis may be important when treating stroke patients. This phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study compared the effect of NXY-059, desmopressin, and placebo on bleeding time, platelet aggregation, and adhesion in 30 healthy volunteers. NXY-059 did not prolong bleeding time compared with placebo: mean (SD) time for NXY-059, 369.5 seconds (125.0 seconds) versus placebo, 369.1 seconds (136.0 seconds). There were no significant effects on platelet aggregation or adhesion. At a mean unbound plasma concentration (Cu(ss)) of 335 micromol/L, NXY-059 was well tolerated, with no major safety concerns identified. In conclusion, NXY-059 does not appear to affect primary hemostasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".