MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048166796 · doi:10.7202/005012ar

Religion populaire et superstition au Moyen Âge

2002· article· fr· W2048166796 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Micheline Laliberté

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité Sainte-Anne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperstitionHumanitiesPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La superstition, toujours difficile à cerner, est une forme de religionpopulaire plus ou moins reçue ou tolérée. Durant la longue période duMoyen Âge, elle prend différentes figures dont on ne peut rendre comptefacilement. Le propos de cet article est de faire ressortir, à partir de travauxrécents, quelques traits fondamentaux de superstitions au Moyen Âge entenant compte, entre autres, de la perception de certains auteurs de cettepériode. À la suite de cela, nous pourrons mieux saisir quelques unes desvaleurs accolées à ce terme de superstition, valeurs qui ont traversé lessiècles et qui se sont répercutées jusque dans les travaux de chercheurs de ladeuxième moitié du XXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesFrench-language works237,207