Le droit comparé et la violence faite aux femmes : voyages au cœur de la narration identitaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, et dans plusieurs autres pays occidentaux, les crimes d’honneur ont récemment fait l’objet d’une prolifération de discours au cœur desquels se trouve souvent l’idée d’un Occident civilisé opposé à des droits orientaux figés, rétrogrades. Or, la violence au nom de l’honneur n’est pas étrangère aux droits occidentaux et au droit canadien. Dans cet article, nous retraçons les migrations des crimes d’honneur de l’Occident à l’Orient et vice versa pour établir une généalogie de ce phénomène. Ensuite, nous nous attardons à la « défense de provocation », une institution juridique occidentale qui fait parfois resurgir l’honneur comme motif d’homicide à l’occasion de crimes dits passionnels. À partir de cette analyse de l’hybridité juridique, nous en appelons à une fructueuse rencontre des théories postcoloniales et du droit comparé et à une compréhension plus fine de la violence faite aux femmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".