AN APPARATUS FOR SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF RELATIVE PERMEABILITY AND DYNAMIC CAPILLARY PRESSURE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The simultaneous measurement of accurate relative permeability and capillary pressure data is essential for studying the phenomena of two-phase flow in porous media. Conventionally, relative permeability and capillary pressure data are measured separately using different equipment and non-identical core samples or sandpacks. It is rather difficult to maintain the same experimental conditions when measurements are made using different equipment and different porous media samples. Moreover, because relative permeability and capillary pressure can be very sensitive to common variables such as saturation and rock/fluid properties, simultaneous measurement of these properties is extremely important to achieve consistency. A relatively new experimental setup has been constructed to obtain dynamic phase pressure and saturation profiles simultaneously during two-phase flow through porous media under steady state and unsteady state conditions. These experimentally measured properties, along with the other needed data, have then been used to calculate the relative permeability and dynamic capillary pressure profiles. Based on the presented experimental results, it has been found that the new experimental setup is reliable and can reproduce stable relative permeability and dynamic capillary pressure profiles with a minimum level of uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it