Two Cases of Thyroid Carcinoma That Were Not Stimulated by Recombinant Human Thyrotropin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) is being widely used to monitor patients who were previously treated for differentiated thyroid cancers for evidence of recurrence. Its value lies in the avoidance of recurrent episodes of hypothyroidism in the follow-up protocols. rhTSH is also being evaluated as a potential therapeutic adjunct that would spare patients the experience of becoming hypothyroid when undergoing thyroid remnant ablation or treatment for metastases. In some centers, rhTSH is also used to support compassionate care of patients with advanced disease who cannot safely become hypothyroid. The (131)I uptake response to rhTSH, presently an off-label application, is expected to be similar to that of endogenously raised TSH levels. The two cases presented here are cautionary tales in which (131)I uptake by metastases was present under hypothyroid conditions, but absent in one patient and present in only a portion of the lesions in the other, with rhTSH stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".