MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048175477 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.125026

Studying the validity of relativistic hydrodynamics with a new exact solution of the Boltzmann equation

2014· article· en· W2048175477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGoethe-Universität Frankfurt am MainConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoOffice of ScienceTechnische Universität WienNuclear PhysicsUniversität WienFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsBoltzmann equationInvariant (physics)Heavy ionEntropy (arrow of time)Statistical physicsBoltzmann constantClassical mechanicsMathematical physicsElliptic flowIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bjorken hydrodynamics applies to the boost invariant regime of heavy ion collisions; Gubser generalized this to nuclei of finite radius. Assuming Gubser's symmetry, the authors solve the Boltzmann equation numerically, and show that hydrodynamics is applicable in a much larger regime than one might naively expect, even when the ratio of the shear viscosity to the entropy density is relatively large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it