MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048185134 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.39.1.197

CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF URANYL MOLYBDATES. III. NEW STRUCTURAL THEMES IN Na6[(UO2)2O(MoO4)4], Na6[(UO2)(MoO4)4] AND K6[(UO2)2O(MoO4)4]

2001· article· en· W2048185134 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergey V. Krivovichev, Peter C. Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUranylChemistryCrystal chemistryNuclear chemistryCrystallographyCrystal structureOrganic chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two Na uranyl molybdates, Na 6 [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ] and Na 6 [(UO 2 )(MoO 4 ) 4 ], and one K uranyl molybdate, K 6 [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ], have been synthesized by high-temperature solid-state reactions of mixtures of Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 CO 3 , UO 3 and MoO 3 . All three structures were solved by direct methods and refined on the basis of F 2 for all unique data collected with monochromatic Mo K α X-radiation and a CCD (charge-coupled device) detector. The structure of Na 6 [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ] was efined to an agreement factor ( R 1) of 4.1%, calculated using the 1969 unique observed reflections ( F o ≥ 4σ F ), and a goodness-of-fit ( S ) of 1.06. It is triclinic, space group P 1, a 7.637(2), b 8.164(2), c 8.746(2) A, α 72.329(5), β 79.364(5), γ 65.795(4)°, V 472.7(2) A 3 , Z = 1. The structure of Na 6 [(UO 2 )(MoO 4 ) 4 ] was refined to an R 1 of 3.3%, calculated using the 3268 unique observed reflections ( F o ≥ 4σ F ), and a S of 0.97. It is triclinic, space group P 1, a 7.0958(8), b 9.566(1), c 13.415(2) A, α 73.692(2), β 86.621(2), γ 82.940(2)°, V 867.0(2) A 3 , Z = 2. The structure of K 6 [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ] was refined to an R 1 index of 4.9%, calculated using the 1833 unique observed reflections ( F o ≥ 4σ F ), and a S of 0.90. It is triclinic, space group P 1, a 7.8282(8), b 7.8298(8), c 10.302(1) A, α 83.893(2), β 73.131(2), γ 80.338(2)°, V 594.6(1) A 3 , Z = 1. The structural connectivity of these three compounds is notable in that each exhibits themes not previously observed in uranyl compounds. The structures of both Na 6 [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ] and K 6 [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ] contain chains of polyhedra of composition [(UO 2 ) 2 O(MoO 4 ) 4 ] 6− . These chains have not been previously observed and are composed of [ Ur O 4 O Ur O 4 ] dimers consisting of two Ur O 5 ( Ur : uranyl ion) pentagonal bipyramids sharing a common O atom. The dimers are connected into a chain by sharing vertices with MoO 4 tetrahedra, with the chains linked by Na + or K + cations. The structure of Na 6 [(UO 2 )(MoO 4 ) 4 ] consists of finite clusters of composition [(UO 2 ) 2 (MoO 4 ) 8 ] 12− composed of two Ur O 5 pentagonal bipyramids connected by sharing vertices with MoO 4 tetrahedra. The clusters in Na 6 [(UO 2 )(MoO 4 ) 4 ] are oriented parallel to the (001) plane and are linked through Na + cations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207