Heat flow and deep thermal structure near the southeastern edge of the Canadian Shield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five new heat-flow and heat-production measurements in the Archean Superior Province are presented. These measurements include the first heat-flow values to be reported for the Opatica subprovince and the Otish basin. These new data complete the data set acquired in the eastern Canadian Shield during the Abitibi-Grenville Lithoprobe transect. The data set now available in eastern Canada, covering geological provinces ranging in age from 2700 to 400 Ma, achieves sufficient sampling to define the deep thermal structure of a continent near the edge of the craton. It shows that, for the Canadian Shield, there is no simple relation between heat flow and the age of tectonic provinces. The map of heat flow in eastern Canada demonstrates that there is no significant difference in heat flow between the Abitibi subprovince and the Grenville Province (including the Adirondacks) where the area-weighted average heat flow is the same (39 vs. 38 mW·m-2, respectively). Outside the Abitibi, the Superior Province is characterized by a higher heat flow (45 mW·m-2). Heat-flow and gravity data are used together to determine changes in crustal composition and thickness. The analysis of these data and constraints from seismology support the view that the variations in surface heat flow can be entirely accounted for by changes in crustal composition. Heat-flow variations across the Abitibi subprovince indicate that there are significant differences in crustal composition that reflect the complex assemblages that make up the Archean crust. The heat-flow map shows a sharp transition between the Grenville Province and the Appalachians, where the average heat flow is significantly higher (57 mW·m-2). This difference is due to higher heat production in the Appalachian upper crust with the same mantle heat flow as in the shield (~12 mW·m-2 throughout eastern Canada). Lower crustal and upper mantle temperatures are typically low, which might explain the preservation of irregular crustal thickness over several billion years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".