MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048232401 · doi:10.3406/bspf.2006.13395

Un site d'acquisition du schiste pour la fabrication d'anneaux au Néolithique ancien à Saint-Germain-du-Corbéis "l'Ermitage" (Orne)

2006· article· fr· W2048232401 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Fromont, Audrey Maingaud, Sylvie Coutard, Guy Leclerc, Benjamin Bohard, Yann Thomas, François Charraud

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de la Société préhistorique française · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsAccelLab (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les sondages archéologiques réalisés sur l’affleurement de schiste du Pissot de "l’Ermitage" à Saint-Germain-du-Corbéis (Orne, France) ont permis de reconnaître des traces anciennes d’exploitation. Cette dernière consiste en l’extraction de plaques de schiste destinées au façonnage d’anneaux utilisés à la fin du Néolithique ancien. Sur ce site d’acquisition, le façonnage se limite à la mise en forme de disques irréguliers, voire à un simple test du matériau. L’essentiel de la chaîne opératoire est réalisé au sein des sites producteurs installés à proximité (moins de cinq kilomètres). La confection des anneaux est donc organisée entre différents sites localisés à proximité de l’affleurement exploité (au sein de la plaine de Sées/ Alençon). Les objets produits sont ensuite diffusés sur différents sites de Basse-Normandie et du Bassin parisien. Des éléments nouveaux sont donc versés à la compréhension du phénomène d’utilisation des anneaux par la culture du Villeneuve-Saint-Germain/ Blicquy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de la Société préhistorique françaiseSame topicArchaeological and Geological StudiesFrench-language works237,207