MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048232401 · doi:10.3406/bspf.2006.13395

Un site d'acquisition du schiste pour la fabrication d'anneaux au Néolithique ancien à Saint-Germain-du-Corbéis "l'Ermitage" (Orne)

2006· article· fr· W2048232401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de la Société préhistorique française · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsAccelLab (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les sondages archéologiques réalisés sur l’affleurement de schiste du Pissot de "l’Ermitage" à Saint-Germain-du-Corbéis (Orne, France) ont permis de reconnaître des traces anciennes d’exploitation. Cette dernière consiste en l’extraction de plaques de schiste destinées au façonnage d’anneaux utilisés à la fin du Néolithique ancien. Sur ce site d’acquisition, le façonnage se limite à la mise en forme de disques irréguliers, voire à un simple test du matériau. L’essentiel de la chaîne opératoire est réalisé au sein des sites producteurs installés à proximité (moins de cinq kilomètres). La confection des anneaux est donc organisée entre différents sites localisés à proximité de l’affleurement exploité (au sein de la plaine de Sées/ Alençon). Les objets produits sont ensuite diffusés sur différents sites de Basse-Normandie et du Bassin parisien. Des éléments nouveaux sont donc versés à la compréhension du phénomène d’utilisation des anneaux par la culture du Villeneuve-Saint-Germain/ Blicquy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it