MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048243286 · doi:10.1089/g4h.2013.0042

Comparing the Effects of a Novel and a Traditional Proprioceptive Balance Training Program on Activity Adherence and Balance Control in a Healthy University Population: A Preliminary Study

2013· article· en· W2048243286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGames for Health Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)Physical therapyPsychologyAttendanceProprioceptionPsychological interventionPhysical activityPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This study explored balance performance and participant adherence to either the Wii Fit™ (Nintendo of America, Redmond, WA) or a proprioceptive BOSU(®) (Ashland, OH) ball balance program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty university-aged participants were randomly allocated to either a Wii Fit or BOSU ball balance training program. Participants engaged in one of the two training regimens for 20 minutes, three times a week, for 4 weeks. Adherence was measured by recording attendance and time spent at each session. Motivational factors associated with adherence were assessed using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. Balance was measured using a stabilometer. RESULTS: No significant difference in participant adherence was found between the groups. Significantly higher levels of activity enjoyment were reported from participants assigned to the Wii Fit intervention, and a positive correlation was found between physical activity enjoyment and adherence. A significant main effect for time demonstrating improved balance scores for both groups was found. No significant interaction between program type and time was found. DISCUSSION: Although both interventions led to balance improvements, Wii Fit participants reported significantly higher levels of activity enjoyment. Although these higher levels of enjoyment did not lead to a statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to the number of sessions attended, participants assigned to the Wii Fit group spent more time engaged in the balance training activities than those allocated to the BOSU group. Although this study is preliminary and has the limitations of being statistically underpowered and dissimilar from the unsupervised home-based programs often prescribed by health professionals, results suggest that exergaming-based balance training may be an important adjunct to traditional training programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it