Geophysical transect across a Paleoproterozoic continentcontinent collision zone: The Trans-Hudson Orogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A summary and comparison of geophysical data and models for the Trans-Hudson Orogen in northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan are presented. Magnetic total field and Bouguer gravity maps are used to define the along-strike extension of geological domains of the orogen exposed on the Canadian Shield, and a two-dimensional density model is produced, which accounts for the observed variations of the Bouguer gravity field across the orogen. An 800-km-long crustal section across the entire continentcontinent collision zone, including the edges of the bounding cratonic blocks, is presented. It incorporates seismic reflectivity, seismic velocities, resistivity, and density models. Key results include (1) evidence for west-vergent crustal stacking and exhumation in the eastern Trans-Hudson Orogen in the form of preserved Moho topography and the presence of higher grade (higher velocity) rocks in the hanging wall of an east-dipping crustal stack; (2) definition of the eastward extent of the Archean Sask craton in the subsurface based on distinct lower crustal properties; and (3) 400 m of present-day surface topography and 68 km of relief on the Moho are isostatically compensated mainly within the upper mantle by a westward increase in upper mantle temperatures by 40155 °C and (or) 16107 km of thinning of the mantle lithosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".