MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048246865 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.165136

Variational approach for calculating Auger electron spectra: Going beyond the impurity approximation

2013· article· en· W2048246865 on OpenAlex
Anamitra Mukherjee, G. A. Sawatzky, Mona Berciu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCopper-based nanomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsImpurityPropagatorVariational methodSpectral lineIonElectronAuger electron spectroscopyPhysicsAugerQuantum mechanicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a variational method to calculate the two-hole propagators relevant for Auger spectroscopy in transition-metal oxides. This method can be thought of as an intermediary step between the full solution (which is difficult to generalize to systems with partially filled bands) and the impurity approximation. Like the former, our solution has full translational invariance, and like the latter, it can be generalized to certain types of systems with partially filled bands. Here we compare both our variational approximation and the impurity approximation against the exact solution for a simple one-dimensional model with filled bands. We show that when the energies of the eigenstates residing primarily on the transition-metal ions do not overlap with those of the eigenstates residing primarily on oxygen ions, both approximations are valid but the variational approach is superior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it