Chimeric SOD2/3 inhibits at the endothelial-neutrophil interface to limit vascular dysfunction in ischemia-reperfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After an ischemic episode, reperfusion causes profound oxidative stress in the vasculature of the afflicted tissue/organ. The dysregulated accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide, has been closely linked to the production and release of proinflammatory mediators, a profound increase in adhesion molecule expression by the vascular endothelium, and infiltration of neutrophils during ischemia-reperfusion (I/R). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) has been shown to protect tissues and organs against I/R-induced injury; however, the drug had to be continuously perfused or kidneys had to be occluded to prevent clearance. We used intravital microscopy, a system that allowed us to visualize neutrophil-endothelial interactions within the mesenteric postcapillary venules of cats subjected to I/R and tested the hypothesis that I/R-induced neutrophil recruitment was inhibited by treatment with SOD2/3. SOD2/3 is a chimeric fusion gene product that contains the mature SOD2 as well as the COOH-terminal "tail" of SOD3 and, unlike the three naturally occurring SODs (SOD1, SOD2, and SOD3), which bear a net negative charge at pH 7.4, SOD2/3 is positively charged and physiologically stable. Our results suggest that not only does SOD2/3 have a much greater efficacy in vivo than the native human SOD2, but its administration prevents I/R-induced neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions and microvascular dysfunction. Moreover, our data support the hypothesis that reactive oxidants mediate I/R-induced injury and that the chimeric recombinant SOD2/3 has the potential to be a therapeutic agent against this debilitating illness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".