Les lettres et les mots : Édition des deux premiers chapitres des Montanicæ linguæ elementa de Jean-Baptiste de la Brosse, s.j. (c. 1768)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les textes qui nous parlent de la Nouvelle-France et de la rencontre entre les Européens et les peuples autochtones du continent nord-américain, il est temps de rendre justice aux ouvrages rédigés en latin. Cet article propose l a première édition du texte latin des deux premiers chapitres (les lettres [ch. 1], et les mots [ch. 2]) de la grammaire montagnaise rédigée vers 1768 par le jésuite Jean-Baptiste de la Brosse. Cette édition est précédée de quelques réflexions aidant à remettre ce travail dans le contexte des autres ouvrages linguistiques réalisés en Nouvelle-France, en soulignant les questions que pose la description des langues amérindiennes réalisée à travers le prisme des structure de la grammaire latine qui a servi à la fois d’outil théorique et de modèle interprétatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".